Skip to main content

Table 4 Features of experimental investigations on the efficiency of CBCT for detecting VRFs when there are both root filling material and intracanal post present

From: Diagnostic efficacy of cone-beam computed tomography for detection of vertical root fractures in endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review

Author/Year

Country

Study Design

Sample Type

Total Sample Size/CBCT Sample Size

Post Type

Sensitivity%

Specificity%

Accuracy%

Mohammadpour et al. (2014)/[39]

Iran

In-vitro

Extracted Single-Rooted Teeth

80/40

1. Titanium

2. Stainless steel

90.91

82.17

76.74

68.05

82.34

73.12

Moudi et al. (2014)/[30]

Iran

Mandibular Premolars and Molars

96/16

Prefabricated post (gold-plated screw)

81

100

-

Junqueira et al. (2013)/[22]

Brazil

Single-Rooted Teeth

18/9

Cast metal post

Voxel Size 0.125: 89

Voxel Size 0.25: 67

Voxel Size 0.125: 45

Voxel Size 0.25: 56

Voxel Size 0.125: 69

Voxel Size 0.25: 75

Abdinian et al. (2016)/[27]

Iran

Premolars and Molars

120/20

Prefabricated screw-type post

70

65

67

Fernanda Chiguti et al. (2021)/[40]

Brazil

Premolars

60/10

Metallic Post

Examiner (1): 80

Examiner (2): 70

Examiner (1): 100

Examiner (2): 100

Examiner (1): 90

Examiner (2): 85

Fernanda Chiguti et al. (2021)/[40]

Brazil

Premolars

60/10

Fiberglass Post

Examiner (1): 50

Examiner (2): 30

Examiner (1): 80

Examiner (2): 90

Examiner (1): 65

Examiner (2): 60

De Lima Moreno et al. (2022)/[41]

Brazil

Single-rooted Teeth

20/10

Fiberglass

92

85

88

De Lima Moreno et al. (2022)/[41]

Brazil

Single-rooted Teeth

20/10

Metallic Post

87

77

82

Oliveira et al. (2021)/[36]

Brazil

Ex-vivo

Human Premolars

45/15

Metallic Post

83

53

68

Wanderley et al. (2021)/[38]

Brazil

Retrospective

CBCT Images

30/15

Cast metal post

46.6

60.4

57.8